FitStrong PT, Kettlebell Training, Strength training

How Hard is Hard Enough?

The Less and More conundrum 

Confession time – I’m one of those people who keeps stuff. Not like a serious hoarder like you’d see on TV, but a collector of details. 

I can proudly claim to have a record of every s.i.n.g.l.e training session I’ve done with every client over the years, including group classes and workshops. I also have records of my own training going back to 1989 when I took up cycling firstly for touring then as a competitive cyclist. 

At first it just seemed like a good idea to see how progress is made with time per each training program but in reflection the historical details added value regarding the ‘how’ the progress was made. 

At times progress was made unexpectedly and wasn’t achieved when expected – ‘what the deuce’? 

Some common themes became identifiable: 

  1. High Intensity (90%+) only works for the short term, like a booster button. But soon it wore off and continuing to hit that booster button lead to niggles and injuries. Short, infrequent use of high intensity seems valuable, like a 1 or 2 of sessions every 4th to 6th week. 
  2. Repeatable efforts, repeated often lead to more ‘what the heck’ affects than any other effort. By repeatable or medium-high I am really describing an effort you could label as being in the:
    • Goldilocks zone.
    • Like an 80% effort or.
    • An effort where you always stop the set a few reps from really pushing it.
  3. However, #2 is conditional on one big provision – consistency. Frequently training a focussed movement in hand with medium efforts leads to be best advancements. 

Regardless of whether the goal is maximal strength or endurance, frequent medium efforts with very infrequent bursts of high intensity delivers favourable results and to be honest, if you want to vastly reduce the likelihood of injury, leaving out the high intensity all together works just as well. Seriously!

Consistency transcends Intensity

Over the past few years I’ve used less and less high intensity work. Instead, I’ve favoured training 3-5 times a week where I follow one of two patterns. 

I either spend weeks just turning up, putting in some medium efforts, leaving the gym to return again the next time without strain or stress or injury or, I follow a 6 to 8 week program that gradually waves the number of reps I use upwards until on the final week or two I work somewhat harder, to achieve a new personal best or achieve a goal I had set. 

Overall though, the medium efforts used allow for another vital component of success, that of practice. By comparison, if you take a high intensity approach to training, near all of your focus is on pushing as hard as you can to achieve the set. Attention to form, correct breathing and safety is near zero! You are just too distracted by the effort to have any chance of remembering good form. 

By practicing at a sustainably comfortable effort, you can pay attention to what you are doing. 

Revisiting the ‘consistency transcends intensity’ idea, doing something well and often leads to progress via skill acquisition and good exposure to the target movements AND specific adaptations. Conversely, doing something sloppily every now and again leads to …. mmm, getting better at doing something sloppily. 

What sounds better – ‘100% of the time it works all the time’, or ’60% of the time it works some of the time’!

On this latter note, do consider that doing an exercise at high intensity does not allow for high frequency. If you again compare the high intensity model to medium intensity model, which will allow for more overall practice of doing something well over a year? 

I don’t think I need to answer that one.

So, rather than more is more or less is more, or minimalism is best, how about to clarify, more medium effort, less high intensity.

If you are one of those people who really enjoy the feeling of getting out of breath or pushing up a new weights personal best, how can it be done?

First off, I’d suggest you really question why you want to use high intensity? 

Is it because you think it will deliver results more quickly? 

Maybe you do actually enjoy the satisfaction of high effort? 

Perhaps you like to punish yourself for something, like eating, poor personal relationships or a crappy job? Perhaps you like showing off amongst your gym rat companions hehe! 

If it’s the latter you need a different outlay and help.

If it’s the former, you need to reread everything I’ve written above and the program idea below.

If it’s the second idea, well then, you need to look at your high efforts strategically and in keeping with a well structured program and a valid, realistic and attainable goal. 

Here’s a program for y’all. 

One of the simplest yet effective examples of working with medium efforts to achieve a new strength goal is outlined below (a Pressing program) and can be read about further in this post https://movestrong.studio/2015/08/19/consistency-trumps-intensity/  from a while back. It is one of my favourite easy-simple programs.

In habit coaching we often refer to working on your one thing, one thing at a time. This program does just that too. Each session increases in volume in a minimal dose, consistently over 3 sessions a week for up to 8 weeks. The volume just creeps up over the weeks without really affecting the perceived efforts. Your attention to technique grows steadily and you run next to negligible risk of injury. Starting a program healthy is a clear and obvious condition. 

There are many ways to play out this gradual or waving volume game in programs – this is just one. But it works with the model of consistent medium efforts over the long run. Dan Johns Easy Strength, Steve Justas singles program, Enter the Kettlebell – Rite of Passage are all examples of great medium effort programs that get you stronger. 

This program consists of 20 sets of Kettlebell Pressing

Over a 20 minute session, each set starts pretty much on the minute every minute. This is NOT obligatory of course. You’ll notice it’s written as 5 blocks of 4 sets, just for the purpose of writing the progressions. 

Rest between sets by shaking off tension to ready yourself for the next set whether it’s on the minute or not. Note: bigger guys with relatively bigger weights will need longer rests than the majority of people. 

Day 1: 1,1,1,1 x 5 rounds 20 total reps

Day 2: 1,1,1,2 x 5 rounds 25 total reps

Day 3: 1,1,2,2 x 5 rounds 30 total reps

Day 4: 1,1,1,2 x 5 rounds 25 total reps

Day 5: 1,1,2,2,x 5 rounds 30 total reps

Day 6: 1,2,2,2 x 5 rounds 35 total reps

Day 7: 1,1,2,2,x 5 rounds 30 total reps

Day 8: 1,2,2,2 x 5 rounds 35 total reps

Day 9: 2,2,2,2 x 5 rounds 40 total reps 

Do you see how the volume waves up and down? Three sessions progress in reps then, go back one step and continue. 

You continue until you achieve 20 sets of 4 reps, rest a few days then retest your max, 5 rep max or anything in between that you desire.

The total of 80 reps works fine for pressing however for squats for example, I’d work with 10 sets with the same rep scheme and more rest between sets (2-4 minutes). That does accumulate up to 40 reps but seems to work best for most people. 

This program works great also for Front Squats, Bench Press, Pull Ups or Rows. A similar concept can also be applied to many speed and endurance activities.

You could naturally conduct your own 10-15 years trial to see what works best or just use what I’ve found 😉 

Need help building a successful program for strength and fitness? 

Punch in your contact info below… 

Contact us

0894462653
movewithjamie@gmail.com

FitStrong PT, group training, Healthy Eating, personal training, Strength training, transformation

Amazing 12 Total Body Transformation 2022

It might be ages away yet, but we’re already taking bookings for the very successful Amazing 12 ‘2022’ wave.

Maybe treat yourself this Christmas (yikes, I said Christmas) to a place on the Amazing 12 Total Body Transformation program.

If you’re in the Brisbane area, this program is ideal for you. However, even if remote, very soon a solution may be available to still avail of the A12 benefits from home. More on this later.

The A12 guarantees Strength, Fitness, Physique transformation and a solid education. #brisbanegym #brisbane #amazing12 #paulmcilroyamazing12 #totalbodytransformation #transformation #albanycreekgym

www.amazing12brisbane.com.au

Start 2026 the Smart Way

The new year sees a lot of people try to jump into their ‘new me’ with strength training or running etc, when their body actually needs some mobility first-off.  These are awesome goals, ones that I stand by and help my clients develop; but, if you’ve done no exercise over the past month, 6 months…

Do You Value Strength?

No one appreciates the values of strength until weakness becomes a reality of life. A straight-up statement but it’s based on the realities I see whenever someone decides to start training. I’ll hear some of the following… and you can fill in the blanks with any number of verbs. ‘I struggle with ____ing’. ‘I can’t…

The Only 5 Exercises You Need

For a Strong Life Over 50 Walk into any gym and you’ll see a multitude of ‘stuff’ happening. Stuff is an apt description! Some of it might look awesome, inspiring, frightening or downright weird! Is any or all of it a requirement for optimal or maximal physical health? Do you really need to do dozens…

FitStrong PT

How much you Function bro?

Reframing functional training for the masses.

The whole ‘do you even [enter an exercise]’ phrase is a parody of modern gym culture with dudes and dudettes comparing each others infatuations in the gyms with one-another. “Do you even lift”? Condescending proclamation that you are smaller than me, or “Do you even bench bro?” Context: my chest is bigger than yours. Ah, what a wonderful day and age we live in! All in jest naturally but essentially such expressions continue to draw the gym and fitness world towards body part, size and looks focus. Isn’t it about me and not you?!

I’d like to jump in with my effort now albeit rather late in the game but with this question: “Do you even function bro”?

NOT FUNCTIONAL TRAINING

Functional training all started to become a buzz definition in gyms in the wake of its appropriate use in physiotherapy settings. What started at daily activity task specific training to rehabilitate poor movement habits morphed into taking elements of everything a human can do (regardless of efficacy) and turning it into a competition with oneself and others. This meanders into the CrossFit territory which has in of itself and training concept, exploded in popularity. CrossFit has done wonderful things for developing community based fitness lifestyles, bringing popularity back to gymnastics and Olympic lifting and for promoting gyms absent of machines.

My only criticism is that it’s conceptual training model of high intensity generalism leads to high risk factor exercise for the masses who do run blindly towards the high intensity functional training model when in need of a dose of exercise. Nothing wrong with HIIT from time to time, but it needs to be timely and appropriate – not a fix for all. This though is no longer a CrossFit problem but a greater problem in the pop-up copycat gyms who are jumping onboard the model, both in terms of the pursuit of high intensity training and business.

Generalism is a fine approach to improving ones physical capabilities and indeed, us humans are perfectly designed to be generally adapt at all physical expectations. We have evolved successfully by walking, climbing, running, jumping, carrying loads, picking up loads, squatting, pushing and pulling things, rotating, explosively moving and moving with intricate detail and control.

Modern human is potentially losing many of these qualities at a gross scale, but that’s a conversation over a stiff drink sometime.

Adding high intensity to complex movements is where the line should be drawn however.

The value system for many fitness organisations and programs has a broken gear box, where 5th gear seems to be the only gear. If you’re not breaking a sweat and breaking down with fatigue there’s a “what’s the point?” attitude. However, as expert generalists we shouldn’t be applying high exertions to every function we can perform. Whilst some activities like running (safely) and walking uphill lend themselves well to high efforts, snatching a barbell (intended for single repetition efforts) for multiple repetitions is a complex movement with a high risk to reward ratio. So too are all movements requiring fine skills.

If we value functioning as a better human shouldn’t we practice and develop our exercise skill and quality culture rather than fatigue culture?

What if we used our gym time as contextual strength and fitness practice and development?

As much as I love to finish my training sessions, I certainly don’t rush them to the detriment of movement quality or risking injury, or to beat some arbitrary time. I focus on completing the task at hand well, better than before but within my capabilities. My comfort zones might get shoved gently to encourage adaptation but I’m certainly not allowing ego to take over for some imaginary trophy at the end of it!

The goal is to keep the goal the goal. A now famous quote from coach Dan John. It shouldn’t require definition. My goal, everyones goal in performing physical training should be progressing positively our health, fitness and strength outcomes. It’s not a race but a credit based scheme we keep adding to until we might need to make a withdrawal. For instance, when your partner hurts an ankle during a bush walk and you’ve to support them or carry them back to the car. Or when the car breaks down and you’ve to push it somewhere safe. Maybe something more sporty, when you place high priority on the winning now and health later! Most sports fall into this realm.

Much recent sports science research supports the gradual moderation approach to long-term progress rather than transient (brief) benefits from a 4 week smash in the gym. It seems the body holds onto the benefits of our physical practices from moderate efforts with only occasional higher efforts, well planned in a training cycle.

Contextual Training

Exertion levels aside, the choice of our strength movements are really quite simple. I’ve left this last part for the end of my chit-chat.

Ask yourself this: What does your life require you to be stronger at?

Early I mentioned the general physical qualities we excel at. Let’s look again:

Walking, climbing, running, jumping, carrying loads, picking up loads, squatting, pushing and pulling things, rotating, explosively moving and moving with intricate detail and control.

If you called these 12 categories of strength and fitness, you could take each and slot in a variation that suits your needs.

Whilst walking, climbing, running are simple without much variability, the carrying, picking up, squatting, pushing, pulling and rotations will most definitely have some personalisations.

If you’re a mother or father of two young children these will have very specific personalisations.

If you’re a labourer you will have your own personalisations too, as too will sports people, people who sit or stand for a living and of course the elderly will have a set of strengths and skills required to make life better.

That is the goal isn’t it – to make life better.

I used to love heavy barbell squatting, bench pressing and even bicep curls but to be honest, I got bored after a while once I achieved what I wanted from them and I got frustrated once I started to pick up some overuse injuries. It stopped being contextual to my life. That was up until 2012. Things have evolved since then thankfully.

There is nothing wrong with having a movement specific goal but overall, using gym time to add to the quality of our lives should be priority and using programs that are contextual to our own lives is in my opinion, a step in the right direction.

To continue this conversation on a personal level, if you are intrigued by contextual training for your life, please do get in touch.

Until 2020, have a very Merry Christmas an awesome new year.

Jamie

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨